PDA

View Full Version : (big boobs) 義母と叔母~そして友人の母~ [Guilty][HCG] - 203 png's



TheGrifter
12-31-2005, 09:51 AM
Minna-san, happy new year! :D

I'd like to welcome the new year with another big boobs set, this time Guilty's 義母と叔母~そして友人の母~, or 'Mother-in-law and Aunt - And Mother Of Friend' (that's what babelfish said, so sue me. :p )
Also included are some wallpapers I stumbled over while searching for the set (ended up screencap'n it myself), and while I'm perfectly aware X-Mas is over already... I decided to post them anyway. :cool: Ain't I nice...

Getchu: <click here> (http://www.getchu.com/soft.phtml?id=208261)

MakerHP: Guilty (http://www.guilty-soft.com/gg25/index.htm)

Contains: big boobs (did I mention that already...? :D ), cons, mild noncons, oral, anal, tit****, ws, toys, probably incest, some gangbang.

Info: 800x600, 97,5MB + 4MB .rar, tracked by DeltaAnime

Happy leeching, and again, happy New Year!!!

raizen
12-31-2005, 11:12 PM
Another awesome torrent there TheGrifter! Hell... I've got 2 other sets uploaded by you waiting to be 'repped'. So I'll just Thank You 1st, and then come back for the rep when I've spread around some other reps...

darkincubo
01-05-2006, 09:24 AM
Wow this looks shota, I thought Complete was the only company that made shota out there. Juicy I thank you for this.

edit: my mistake, I was misslead by the last thumbnail, this is not shota I think looking at the getchu link.

Foozer
01-16-2006, 07:33 PM
sorry I don't mean to sound like an ignorant hentai fan, but what the heck is shota??

ak404
01-16-2006, 09:48 PM
Pre-adolescent or barely adolescent boys, usually with older women.

kevinsucks
02-08-2006, 05:04 PM
May I request a reseed for this cg? Thanks in advance :)

Altercator
02-09-2006, 02:28 AM
Seconded here. Please?

dcuplover
03-19-2007, 09:43 AM
reseed please?

Gungrave4ever
03-19-2007, 07:56 PM
Oh, gee. Yet another HCG set that I have on my computer. Too bad the people who make these torrents are fucking retards that put everything into archives.

Sorry, guys. I, like everyone else, extract the files and then delete the archive after I've downloaded and seeded for a while. And I can't just repack it because then the hash data doesn't match up.

If you want people to be able to reseed after a while, bitch and moan to the dumb asses who think it's so awesome to make archive file torrents.

orikon
03-19-2007, 10:10 PM
Oh, gee. Yet another HCG set that I have on my computer. Too bad the people who make these torrents are fucking retards that put everything into archives.

Sorry, guys. I, like everyone else, extract the files and then delete the archive after I've downloaded and seeded for a while. And I can't just repack it because then the hash data doesn't match up.

If you want people to be able to reseed after a while, bitch and moan to the dumb asses who think it's so awesome to make archive file torrents.

You DO know that you can view the pictures from the archive without extracting right? Try Comical (http://comical.sourceforge.net/).

In any case, I'd appriciate a new torrent of this or better yet, the actual game.

seorang
03-19-2007, 10:58 PM
Oh, gee. Yet another HCG set that I have on my computer. Too bad the people who make these torrents are fucking retards that put everything into archives.

Sorry, guys. I, like everyone else, extract the files and then delete the archive after I've downloaded and seeded for a while. And I can't just repack it because then the hash data doesn't match up.

If you want people to be able to reseed after a while, bitch and moan to the dumb asses who think it's so awesome to make archive file torrents.

Or, you could just store it in archives. I could whine that there are idiots who have this burning need to extract everything and delete the archive, when its so much easier and faster to move the archive.

As for the reseed, I'll be able to do it in 6-8 hours when my current torrent finishes, so have patience, or if you don't, just PM TheGrifter, since I guess none of you read his sig.

TheGrifter
03-20-2007, 08:16 AM
Exactly as you say, seorang.
Anyway, reseeding now. And btw, they are STILL archives. :cool:

kuropon
03-20-2007, 09:56 AM
Sorry, guys. I, like everyone else, extract the files and then delete the archive after I've downloaded and seeded for a while. And I can't just repack it because then the hash data doesn't match up.

If you want people to be able to reseed after a while, bitch and moan to the dumb asses who think it's so awesome to make archive file torrents.

I, like you, feel the need to extract out everything and delete the archives... I also prefer (for most things) when the torrent just contains a bunch of images instead of an archive, because quite a few times I've downloaded a set and decided I didn't like it. The only time when I can see the archive being an actual advantage is when you're torrenting up bmp files, because the compression ratio is much higher. Ultimately, it's up to the uploader, and I can respect that they want to keep their hard drive in a certain tidy fashion.

EDIT:
That comical program looks like it might be neat... Too bad it doesn't support 7zip compression... It's also too bad that it crashed on 5 of the 6 archives I tested it on...

Gungrave4ever
03-20-2007, 11:07 PM
Or, you could just store it in archives.Did you fail to read the part where I delete archives?
I could whine that there are idiots who have this burning need to extract everything and delete the archive,Except they aren't idiots. The idiots are the ones who have this idea—gods knows how it got implanted into their thick skulls (possibly from seeing other idiots do it)—that archives are superior.
when its so much easier and faster to move the archive.No it's not. It takes as much time to move a folder as it does an archive file. Possibly even less time, since the archive file is larger than each individual item contained within it.

Futhermore, there should be no .bmp files, ever. Who uses that format anymore? .png is just like .bmp, but a fraction of the size. So while archiving would be useful for .bmp files, .bmp files shouldn't exist in the first place. Thus, there is no need for archive files.

Desmonthes
03-20-2007, 11:12 PM
Archive is better when burning, copying and sharing -_-
And most of the image viewer programs support popular archive format.

If you want people to be able to reseed after a while, bitch and moan to the dumb asses who think it's so awesome to make archive file torrents. lol, DPG you bitches

seorang
03-21-2007, 02:36 AM
The idiots are the ones who have this idea—gods knows how it got implanted into their thick skulls (possibly from seeing other idiots do it)—that archives are superior. No it's not. It takes as much time to move a folder as it does an archive file. Possibly even less time, since the archive file is larger than each individual item contained within it.

I never said size. Ever tried moving a 100MB folder with 1000 pics compared to a 100MB rar archive? PCs move 1 large file faster than multiple small files with the same total size.

So you delete archives. I don't hear about you whining about archives when you're downloading the HCGs. At least kuropon has a point about seeing pics and deleting those he doesn't like. Your points just don't cut it.

Gungrave4ever
03-22-2007, 12:27 AM
Archive is better when burning, copying and sharing -_-Uh, no, no, and no. Burn an archive to a disc: if you want to access the images later, it'll take longer for the disc to open an archive than to just have a folder with all the images. Copying and sharing: I've already stated what's wrong. Are you even following this thread?

And most of the image viewer programs support popular archive format.I should not have to download any extra program bullshit to my computer to get a torrent to correctly work. In fact, I shouldn't even need to download an archive extracter. Everything should already be right there in a folder, all files sorted out.

Learn how to read a thread before repeating what's already been argued and retorted against.


I never said size.[quote]And I never said you did! [quote]Ever tried moving a 100MB folder with 1000 pics compared to a 100MB rar archive?Yes, I have! How else would I know about the speed difference?
PCs move 1 large file faster than multiple small files with the same total size.Except not. Did you even bother to read my previous post? You certainly type like you didn't.

Furthermore, you limited your example to PCs; what about Macs and Linux systems? Not everyone uses PCs.


So you delete archives.Yeah, I do. And I'm not the only one; lots of people do that.
I don't hear about you whining about archives when you're downloading the HCGs.You don't hear anything because this is text. Hopefully you don't need a text-to-sound converter. Furthermore, I've been bitching about archive files for as long as I've been a member of this site: two years now. Take a look at my past posts in my profile.
At least kuropon has a point about seeing pics and deleting those he doesn't like. Your points just don't cut it.Oh, and why does "archives make it more difficult to reseed later down the road" not cut it? I thought since this is a torrent site, seeding would be a crucial part of things working properly. But, according to you, that's incorrect. Ah, well.

seorang
03-22-2007, 12:58 AM
Illogical. How about demanding direct downloads of HCG packs, so that you don't have to download and install bullshit torrent programs?

Stop being literal. You know what I mean. I've never seen or heard you whine about archives in the HCG forums until a few days ago.

I've tested moving a folder of 100 1MB files and a archive of 102MB. Guess what? Archive moves faster. Guess its a case of my word vs yours.

Your arguments is that you'll only reseed if its in a folder instead of archive. You haven't explained how archives makes things more difficult to reseed later down the road, especially if you're not removing disliked pictures and such (and if you did, you can't really reseed the complete set even if it was a folder, can you?). Publicly announcing that you'll only reseed in a folder instead of archives is imposing conditions, not providing any basis of reasoning so far.

Desmonthes
03-22-2007, 03:10 AM
Uh, no, no, and no. Burn an archive to a disc: if you want to access the images later, it'll take longer for the disc to open an archive than to just have a folder with all the images. Copying and sharing: I've already stated what's wrong. Are you even following this thread?proof ? access the archive and folder on cd/dvd work the same way on HD

I should not have to download any extra program bullshit to my computer to get a torrent to correctly work. In fact, I shouldn't even need to download an archive extracter. Everything should already be right there in a folder, all files sorted out.bare windows ftw then :rolleyes:

Furthermore, you limited your example to PCs; what about Macs and Linux systems? Not everyone uses PCs. :eek: they can't open rar, zip file ?

Oh, and why does "archives make it more difficult to reseed later down the road" not cut it? I thought since this is a torrent site, seeding would be a crucial part of things working properly. But, according to you, that's incorrect. Ah, well.
Depend on if the archive is smaller than the file(s) you need to torrrent/ sharing or not.

Gungrave4ever
03-24-2007, 01:13 AM
Wow, Desmonthes, you totally failed there. Try reading this thread before making stupid shit comments.


Illogical. How about demanding direct downloads of HCG packs, so that you don't have to download and install bullshit torrent programs?You know, that's an awesome idea! I think I'll do that! Oh, but wait, then I would need to install WinRar to extract the files, so the purpose is ultimately defeated. Dar, har, har!


Stop being literal.So you'd rather I be illeratate?
You know what I mean.If I knew what you meant, I wouldn't be questioning what you meant.
I've never seen or heard you whine about archives in the HCG forums until a few days ago.Point? Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean I haven't done it. Or do you think I don't masturbate just because you don't see me masturbate?


I've tested moving a folder of 100 1MB files and a archive of 102MB.And so have I.
Guess what?I'm guessing you're a n00b.
Archive moves faster.Not on my computer.
Guess its a case of my word vs yours.Yep.


Your arguments is that you'll only reseed if its in a folder instead of archive.No, that is not my argument. How about you go back and re-read this thread. Stop making bullshit up.
You haven't explained how archives makes things more difficult to reseed later down the road,Go back and re-read this thread, because I did explain.
especially if you're not removing disliked pictures and suchBut maybe I am.
(and if you did, you can't really reseed the complete set even if it was a folder, can you?).I can still reseed something, which is better than nothing.
Publicly announcing that you'll only reseed in a folder instead of archives is imposing conditions, not providing any basis of reasoning so far.Shit, can you fucking read? 'Cause by the looks of things, you want me to be illiterate just like you.

Desmonthes
03-24-2007, 04:25 AM
Wow, Desmonthes, you totally failed there. Try reading this thread before making stupid shit comments.Enlighten me then.
People asked for reseeding and you came in, bitching about how stupid of people to share their stuff in archive format, then ? We just want to prove that you are wrong, unless a lot of scanlation, artbook release groups are just "dumb asses" as you stated.

TheGrifter
03-24-2007, 05:23 AM
My my. :cool: I really didn't expect the spanish inquisition when I originally posted this set... ;)

gg4e: I cannot help but find your way of stating your point as needlessly offensive. Not to say you painfully obviously lack both basic decency and politeness. In short, in case you didn't get what I want to say:
FGS, stop throwing sh1t on people. :rolleyes:
Additionally, I increasingly doubt you're fully aware of the fact that you are going to great lengths to piss of an official HF Moderator. I can't help but admire Desmonthes's almost infinite amount of patience (which he already displayed in the past while moderating the SB3 Modding & Translation threat, ah, thread ;) ); don't think I could just shrugg you off like he can...

Gungrave4ever
03-25-2007, 12:10 AM
Enlighten me then.Sorry, I'm not the Buddha. I don't have authority to enlighten people.


People asked for reseeding and you came in, bitching about how stupid of people to share their stuff in archive format, then ?Can you correctly write a sentence, or are you simply questioning what's going on? Because last I checked, statements end with periods and not question marks, while also not ending with a conjuction archive.

Oh, yeah, and you still didn't read this thread.


We just want to prove that you are wrong,Well then do it! Because right now, you guys are failing. Hard.

unless a lot of scanlation, artbook release groups are just "dumb asses" as you stated.Which they are. I guess that's why you're failing to prove I'm wrong.


My my. :cool: I really didn't expect the spanish inquisition when I originally posted this set... ;) Spanish Inquisition ceased centuries ago. Get with the times. This is the Internet Inquisition of the 21st Century.


gg4e: I cannot help but find your way of stating your point as needlessly offensive.Oh, really? "I can't reseed this because it's an archive file .torrent and I deleted the archive." is offensive? Well if that's considered offensive to you, I can only imagine what happens when you get BOOM HEADSHOT on CS.


Not to say you painfully obviously lack both basic decency and politeness.Well if I had to choose between intelligence and politeness, I'd choose intelligence. Making archive file torrents is fucking stupid. And in the end, it's neither decent nor polite, since it makes reseeding difficult later.

In short, in case you didn't get what I want to say:Yeah, I didn't. Maybe you should stop wasting your time typing nonsense that doesn't get your point across and just cut to the point. That whole politeness vs. intelligence thing again.

FGS, stop throwing sh1t on people. :rolleyes:
you painfully obviously lack both basic decencyDon't preach like you have basic decency. You think replacing a letter in a vulgar words makes the word non-vulgar? Think again.


Additionally, I increasingly doubt you're fully aware of the fact that you are going to great lengths to piss of an official HF Moderator.I'm not going to great lengths to piss anyone off. I'm going to great lengths to set these people in line. I declared that I would reseed this if I had the ability. But because you—for whatever stupid reason suits you best—thought making an archive file into a .torrent would be a good idea, I can't. From there, everyone else got all pissed-pants.


I can't help but admire Desmonthes's almost infinite amount of patience (which he already displayed in the past while moderating the SB3 Modding & Translation threat, ah, thread ;) ); don't think I could just shrugg you off like he can...Well of course not! You think it's offensive to say that I can't reseed a torrent because I don't have the original archive! Dude with your temper can't possibly "shrugg" (WTF?) anything off.

Desmonthes
03-25-2007, 02:07 AM
Oh, yeah, and you still didn't read this thread.Proof ?
What is the point of your first post in this thread from the start ?

TheGrifter
03-25-2007, 06:32 AM
:D LOL, gg4e, you're priceless!!! I can honestly say that it's been years in the past when I last was involved in a discussion with someone having such a highly selective memory about what he himself wrote a few posts earlier as you have. Someone like you with an artistic ability to turn people's words to fit into his own warped view of reality - you really should have your own show on Fox. :p
However, not knowing a Monty Python quote when you see one... let's say 6.5, you where a little shaky at the landing.

:lol:

As fun as it was feeding a troll I'll leave it to other folks from now on... I'm off to create my next archive to share here on HF. :p

kuropon
03-25-2007, 12:07 PM
Oh, really? "I can't reseed this because it's an archive file .torrent and I deleted the archive." is offensive?
No, they're probably referring to this post as being offensive:

bitch and moan to the dumb asses who think it's so awesome to make archive file torrents.
I'm sure you knew that, though...

Let's break it down, so we can have a REAL discussion of archive vs non-archive formats:
For BMP photos.
I started with a folder of pictures that I donwloaded from the game Sweet Pleasure NS. The set was 255mb uncompressed. Making it into an archive by compressing it with 7zip gave me a file that was 65mb. Turning all the files to png via ACDSee's batch covert method gave me a directory of files that was 110mb. So, even if you were to convert the needlessly large file-sized bmps to pngs, you're still not saving nearly as much space/bandwidth.

So, putting the bmp format argument aside, here's a couple of reasons why I personally prefer the non-archive vs the archive format of torrents.

1. I like to extract the contents of the archives. Why? I like to organize all the maker's games into subfolders. I convert the directory name to romaji, if need be, and create a text documents inside the folder with the original name, the maker's name, and the getchu link for the game. Most of these steps aren't possible with archived files.

2. Occasionally I'm not sure if the set is going to be one that i'll want to download. If it's not an archive, I can let some pictures download and look at them. If I like what I see, I let the file keep going... If I don't like it, I just stop and delete the torrent at that point.

3. It makes it possible to reseed later, if someone requests it. Even though I might have renamed the directory, I can still go into the torrent client and manually point files to their new location. Haven't done it all that often, but it is handy when I have had to.

4. Viewing files straight out of the archives is sometimes not possible. If the file is compressed with 7zip, you can't just click on some files and have them open up, it always has to extract all the files to a temporary directory (for each individual file you click). This isn't a problem with rar or zip formats, however.

That's all I can think of at the moment.

Zress
03-26-2007, 08:11 AM
"So you'd rather I be illeratate?"

sounds like you already *are* illiterate. but that's not the point of the thread.


GJ! on the hcg set, mistah griftah. :D

Gungrave4ever
03-26-2007, 05:23 PM
Sorry, Zress, but until you can coherently use a keyboard, your words a nothing.


Proof ?
What is the point of your first post in this thread from the start ?Thar archive file .torrents are stupid and so are the people who create them.


No, they're probably referring to this post as being offensive:

I'm sure you knew that, though...If I knew that, I wouldn't have problems figuring out what they're so bitchy about.


For BMP photos.I already declared that BMP photos should not exist because PNG is superior. Fail.

Furthermore, this archive uses PNG, not BMP. Double fail.


I started with a folder of pictures that I donwloaded from the game Sweet Pleasure NS.First and foremost, who gives a fuck? This thread is about 義母と叔母~そして友人の母. Great way to hijack a thread, dumb ass. Triple fail.


The set was 255mb uncompressed. Making it into an archive by compressing it with 7zip gave me a file that was 65mb.So what? Not my fault the original uploader didn't turn them into PNG, and it's not my fault you didn't, either. Quadrupile fail.


Turning all the files to png via ACDSee's batch covert method gave me a directory of files that was 110mb.Still smaller than 225 MB. Quintuple fail.


So, even if you were to convert the needlessly large file-sized bmps to pngs, you're still not saving nearly as much space/bandwidth.225/2= 112.5. You're still saving more than half the space. Suctle fail.


So, putting the bmp format argument aside,Here's a better idea! Let's not enough get off topic about stupid shit like this! Septuple fail.


here's a couple of reasons why I personally prefer the non-archive vs the archive format of torrents.Now you want to be on topic? Furthermore, you're taking my side of the argument; why the fuck are you arguing with someone who's on your side? I guess the n00b in charge of the CS server left FF on. Octo fail!

Atachi
03-26-2007, 07:36 PM
there are multiple reasons why archiving in archive is better than in plain filesystem:

1) source:
the file has the same hash as found on other p2p-networks (which don't allow multiple files in the same download as BT), so the chance of seeds is higher and there is a posibility for a reseed if someone uses the file from somewhere else
2) filesystem-overhead (the most important one):
the more files are listed in a filesystem, the slower it becomes, the more data gets lost occupied by the filetable (each file steals a 1kb record minimum) and the more data gets lost thanks to cluster-overhead (there can only be 1 file in a cluster. the more files and the bigger the clusters, the more data on your hdd is unusable).
3) archives:
they have that name for a reason - to archive files


a good example for 2) is:
burn a DVD-backup full of folders and images - no archives...
take it out of your drive and put it in again... now try to read anything :p
the ISO/UDF overhead is too big for your drive to handle and it'll take ages to access a file



best solution (how torrents should be):
- all archives for manga are supposed to be in ZIP, not RAR or 7Z (because ZIP is the fastest to decompress on the fly in comic-viewers [like cdisplay])
- if it's only a single book, it can go as itself and have a sample (like cover) as attachment to describe the torrent
- if it's multiple books, each book/archive is supposed to be in a subfolder named "artist - title" along with a cover-image [preferably named the same as the archive]to describe the book/archive, so that ppl can set the images to have higher priority in downloading to see if they want that book/archive

Kotonoha
03-31-2007, 05:04 PM
._.

NO ONE insults my Dessie!!!!!

/me shoots Gungrave4ever


In the end, does it really matter whether it's in an archive or not? Both ways have advantages AND disadvantages for each person if you ask me, and I don't see the point of coming into a thread for the sole purpose of complaining, now stop bitching, that's supposed to be MY job. :p

Gunbuster
03-31-2007, 10:05 PM
For a nobody, you sure do post alot. (GG4E)

Good to see a few oldies still lurking about.

(Just trollin', save your flames for someone who cares.)

Death Metal
05-01-2008, 02:23 PM
I know this has been posted, like, 2 years and 1/2 ago, but can we get a reseed if ever possiblke? I have been looking forever for these CGs.

Ps.: Even better if it can come in Rapidshare.

fiabundem
08-15-2008, 10:58 AM
wat he said

bluehope
08-15-2008, 08:29 PM
thanks u for reseed this Cgs .

samfigo
01-04-2009, 10:34 AM
義母と叔母~そして友人の母~ I want to this game.
thank you very much .

samfigo
01-04-2009, 10:36 AM
if you have it . call me please!
forgive me it .
thank you .

bluehope
01-06-2009, 02:15 AM
Rapid links for this Cgs please . thanks in advance

seorang
01-06-2009, 03:50 AM
if you have it . call me please!
forgive me it .
thank you .

Just checked, this torrent is still well-seeded, what's the problem?


Rapid links for this Cgs please . thanks in advance

This is not the place for requests.